RSS
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Monday, April 7, 2014

Give !*#& a chance

Note: I've written about this topic over the years in various places, the most recent probably being Logophile Dilemma: Should I Stop Swearing When I Become a Parent?.

So my swearing had an unexpected consequence that I'm not happy about. It was the basis of a short conversation on a political page that I visit, and that conversation caused a member to leave. Our faithful leader attempted to wrangle the situation back towards the center by deleting my post and a few that came after, then adding a post of his own explaining that he thought the conversation had gotten "a little out of line," both of which had me a little miffed. But only a little. I completely understand the role of moderator and how you have to sometimes take actions that make some people unhappy.

Mostly, I'm unhappy that something I've done helped someone make a decision to leave. But I'm more unhappy that he was upset. And still more unhappy that he used me and my words to judge an entire group. But more than anything, I'm pissed. I'm pissed off that I was judged. I feel like a giant Scarlet Letter was pinned onto me, and then smaller ones handed out to my cohorts.

I had a long, meandering conversation about it with my husband the next morning. Finally I actually told him what was said by me and this other person, he gave me more leeway (rope to hang myself?) because of the man's exact words, and in the end we worked out the most reasonable compromised response that I could live with. I had wanted a unilateral decision on swearing, regardless of situation. He eventually got me to agree that it will always be situational. So I wasn't going to mention the words I said or this person's response, but apparently one is important and if I'm going to reveal it, I can't not reveal the other.

I will have to generalize, because I don't really remember it exactly and now it's lost in the ether. And who knows what was said in the conversation after I went to bed that's now deleted with it?

It started with me saying, "Congress can kiss my grits. Was that 80s enough for ya?" (We had been talking about 80s politics repeating itself) Then I came back and said something along the lines of, "No, I think I'm going to go with, 'Congress can go fuck itself, fuck being my favorite word [....] I think things would be better if everyone gave fuck a chance."

As far as I know, the responses I got were 1 or 2 people appreciating what I said. Kind of. Maybe.

The next morning I woke up to this response, "Goodbye, [name redacted]. Although I have rarely made comments on this site, I have enjoyed the interaction among the various viewpoints. I really don't want to sound judgmental, but the language/images/attitudes have gotten too coarse for me. I don't use this kind of language, so I definitely don't want to invite it into my home or heart through a website that I can simply block or turn off. I simply cannot be a reflection of who Christ wants me to be when I voluntarily expose myself to those things that are neither righteous nor uplifting."

Other people posted agreement/apologies. I posted one word in response, "*crickets*", because I had no idea what to say and I was going to remain silent until I figured it out. I was furious. I wanted a decision by the internet, right then and there, about why "swear words" are unacceptable in a country that is supposedly secular and not dominated by Christianity or any other religion. So I stripped the issue down to bare bones, and posted this question to my Facebook page,

"Pop Quiz: is it more important not to insult someone, or to be honest about who you are?

Does sparing someone's feelings become irrelevant to you based on the other person, your feelings/needs, or just the situation?"

I got some interesting responses. I wanted Eric's response. His immediate response was that it's always situational. So I asked him if the other person's feelings or his feelings have more weight or if it's still always situational, and he agreed with the latter. I asked him why another person's dislike of swearing outweighs the importance of my being true to myself, I'm not going to say "I'm not gay" just because there's a priest in front of me. He said this is different because you can't change being gay, but you can choose different words to express your meaning instead of using offensive words.

So I continued to find different scenarios that I found similar for him to weigh in on. I asked him if he would lie to a priest to keep from offending him, ie: would you tell him he looked fat? Again, he said it was situational, depending on if he was asked straight out for his opinion, how serious the question was, just how fat the priest was, if it was the guy looking for confirmation that a diet was working or not, etc. I asked him if I was expected to not go out in public wearing only a bikini top and a miniskirt because I might offend someone, or should I cover everything up just in case, just not my face because this isn't a Muslim country and we're not into Burqas. I can't recall what he said, hopefully he just ignored me being catty.

At some point he said, "You have to pick your battles." You have to decide what's important to you to fight for. This was getting to the heart of the matter. I found it important to fight for. I think words are important enough to fight for.

So I asked him that, supposing I was a completely reasonable and respectable person who never wanted to insult or offend anyone, did that mean I should never swear because someone by chance might hear me and be offended? He said no, in personal conversations it would be alright. Even if you're in a public place and you're speaking in conversational tones, you have the right to say what you want and not have others take offense by a little something that they can overhear. In the check-out line at the grocery store surrounded by kids would be different. So I finally told him what the hell all of this was about, and asked if it is truly reasonable to expect me not to swear in a forum of friends when I don't know who else is listening that I might offend.

He said no. He was finally on my side! He added that if I was asked to stop, I should acknowledge the request, but also acknowledge that I was doing the person a personal favor and going against my own beliefs to satisfy his. I told him what the guy had said, hounding on the word that echoed in my head, "righteous." He had a chuckle over the "not to be judgmental, but.." line. He reaffirmed that the scenario he had just laid out would be sufficient, something along the lines of, "I didn't know I was offending you, this language doesn't offend me, this is the way that I talk, but because you've asked me to I will refrain just this once at your request." He agreed that the guy had gone above and beyond asking politely, that he had indeed been judgmental, but this was probably the best way to go.

The conversation sputtered out when I jumped onto one more scenario, what if I had been praying? No one would dare ask me to stop if I was praying. Not proselytizing at the top of my lungs in your face, just praying to myself. He said that they would have a right to ask, especially in public, but we both agreed that it would be highly unlikely that I would be asked to stop.

And so there you have it, the answer to my dilemma. I don't want to offend anyone. I am a reasonable person. But I do think this is important enough to fight for. Words are sacred to me. I am offended by anyone who thinks that words can be offensive. I question the feasibility of surrounding oneself with only words that are "righteous" and/or "uplifting." The idea that a word can be considered "evil" or "profane" or "unclean" makes me livid. American culture has taken back the word "queer", Dan Savage is working on "faggot", you can say the word "shit" on TV now. I want to see us take back the word "fuck".

I searched the web to see what the Bible actually says about swearing, and what I discovered could be a whole separate post. But this oneDoes The Bible Ban Profanity? by Julie Morse, had me first infuriated and then finding the author reasonable - a truly maddening experience.

Most of all though, I am personally offended that I was trying to convey something so vital to me in such a small phrase, and instead of anyone getting it (so much of an in joke that I'm the only one that got it!), someone was offended by it and stormed off. Actually, he judged me and my words as non-righteous (ie: evil), then stormed off.

Part 1: Mysie likes the word fuck. She finds it liberating, and wants it liberated.

Part 2: We had just been discussing another generation growing up fearing nuclear war. "Give peace a chance" is a popular hippie phrase, taken from the song by John Lennon (and Yoko Ono and about a dozen or so others apparently, according to Wikipedia), to suggest an alternative to war. A similar phrase from the hippies, "make love, not war", couples with it nicely. Couples. Peace = make love = fucking.

Add them together:

Give fuck a chance. Don't fuck with anyone, don't fuck anyone up, just say what the fuck, go have a good fuck, and chill the fuck out. You'll feel a lot fucking better.

Monday, October 15, 2012

"Want Gay Marriage-Don't shove it down my throat"

Last week was National Coming Out Day. Last week was the anniversary of the murder of Matthew Shepard. Last week a bullied teen in British Columbia committed suicide because she had no one to stand by her. Last week I read in a parenting magazine about how to teach my child to stand up for other kids who are being bullied. And my mother, she taught me to stand up for what I believe in, to speak up when things need to be said, to demand my rights and never let them be trampled on.

Last week, someone posted as a response to a pro-Gay Marriage post: "Want Gay Marriage-Don't shove it down my throat".

Have we really gained such little ground?

What will it take for the majority to realize that as long as we allow this culture of creating second class citizens to survive under law, it will continue to thrive in the hearts and minds of the populace? What will it take for people to realize that stupid comments propagate such a culture? What will it take for people to realize that such a culture promotes bullying? What will it take for people to realize that separate but equal is not equal?

Take a moment, people. Look across the room at someone you love. Ask yourself, would you still love them if they were gay? Ask yourself, what would you do if you discovered it was your child posting videos to Facebook about being bullied by her entire school? Ask yourself, what would you do if your spouse was dying and the hospital taking care of them refused to let you say goodbye? Ask yourself, what would you do if your best friend started dating outside of their race? What if your co-worker's church was vandalized and burned? What if your child cut themselves every day after coming home from school because they had no control over the daily ritual of facing people who constantly put them down for being a slut, a fag, a nerd, a fatty, a Muslim. What would it take for you to care enough to make a difference in their lives? How close would this person have to be to you? Does someone have to be in your immediate family for you to care? Is being your neighbor enough? A coworker? How about a friend of a friend? And how bad would their torture have to be before you had a change of heart and stood up for them? Would you wait until the few voices against them turned into a dozen, an entire classroom, an entire school? Would you wait until they cried themselves to sleep on a weekly basis, or until it was daily? Would you wait until the cutting started, or until the noose was tied?

Every inane comment you allow to slip by is another wound to a victim of bullying, another wound to our community, another wound to our culture, another wound to our democracy. You have every right to say whatever the hell you want to whomever they hell you want. I pity you, your family and loved ones, if those are the words you choose to spout. I pity your community. I pity our nation. We should be better than this. We should have come farther by now.

My mother stood up for others by confronting bad guys, by talking to her children about the differences between people and how differences are ok. The parenting magazine suggests commenting on positive behavior the child sees in daily life and media, and suggested having their kid invite the bullied kid over to play. I'm going to do everything in my power to ensure that not only will my child grow up to stand up for others, but that she will live in a society where she can love whomever she wants and never hide that out of fear. Love and beauty should never have to hide from fear and hate. Today I start by standing up to you and your ridiculous comments that are based on hate and not factual reality. In a few weeks, I continue by voting to ensure marriage in this state is defined by two people loving each other who want to enter into a civil contract, not defined by some religious text that has nothing to do with our government, and not defined by a group of people who only have hate and fear in their hearts.

Monday, February 27, 2012

49 Days: What's on my mind

49 days to go. Holy crap! Yes, somehow curbing my swearing is on my To-Do List. In fact, in the next seven weeks (seven?!?!), I hope to:

• stop swearing
• baby-proof the house
• cat-proof the nursery
• clean out nursery of painting paraphernalia
• set-up nursery (baby furniture assembly, clothing & toys & book organization, decorating, etc)
• finish organizing, cleaning upstairs office, bathroom, bedroom
• celebrate anniversary
• shop for/make presents
• hit every Seattle used book store for out-of-print Stephen Cosgrove's Serendipity series
• pick pediatrician
• attend birthing classes
• attend baby shower
• attend Heidi's birthday party
• pack hospital bag
• agree on Kailea's middle name
• recover from cold
• stop getting sick
• stop cheating on diabetic diet
• gain more weight
• remember to eat veggies
• remember to take vitamins
• make decisions on medications
• episiotomy avoidance training
• cats to vet
• start clipping cats' claws regularly
• kick cats out of bedroom at night, leading up to permanent 24/7 ban
• deal with whiney cats
• finish downstairs "cat haven"
• stop contemplating chopping off my hair
• enjoy regular showers
• stop paying so much attention to politics
• stop having such high expectations of blog and just WRITE
• CALL MY MOTHER
• stop singing the "I'm having an alien baby" song, no matter how freaky it is when she re-enacts scenes from the Alien movies
• somehow eliminate the wound-care scene of the movie "50/50" from my memory
• remember the 500 other things I have to do before baby arrives that I can't seem to recall right now

Stuff on my mind that I can't stop thinking about, but will probably never find the time to actually write about:

Rick Santorum is stupid.
Rick Santorum Pledges To Defund Contraception: ‘It’s Not Okay, It’s A License To Do Things’
Santorum: no apology needed for Quran burning
Santorum: Separation Of Church And State 'Makes Me Want To Throw Up'
Santorum's stone-age view of women

Rick Santorum is dangerous.
Santorum's policies would have killed my daughter

Rick Santorum is offensive to non-Christians, believing that theology not based on the Bible is phony.
Santorum: Obama's worldview upside-down

Non-Christian values and religious views that include environmentalism and helping each other are not phony, nor are they non-Christian.
Kwanzaa (see: Collective Work and Responsibility, Cooperative Economics)
(Christian) Stewardship

Marriage Equality was declared a right by the Supreme Court back in the 60s.
Constitution Day: Marriage Equality Is A Right The Constitution Demands

The Defense of Marriage Act ignores the Constitution's Full Faith and Credit Clause.
Defense of Marriage Act
Full Faith and Credit Clause

Correlation and Causation are not the same fucking thing.
or
Gestational Diabetes is has nothing to do with being fat, and implying it does is offensive, cruel, and dangerous.
Exaggerating the Risks Again
Gestational Diabetes, Weight Loss, & More!
I Am Sure You Have Gestational Diabetes Because You Are Overweight
You Did NOT Eat Your Way to Diabetes!

Hallelujah I have not yet run into any offensive breast-feeding nazis, pregnancy worshippers, parenting saints, or tummy-rubbing personal-space invaders!
Don't Carpe Diem

My mother-in-law is awesome.

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Gay Marriage

Gay marriage is in the spotlight here in Washington state, thanks to a surprise move from our Governor, followed by an historic vote in Olympia. I'm still kind of blinking the sleep from my eyes, wondering how this has all moved along so quickly. Gay marriage being a subject I'm personally very passionate about, I wanted to organize my thoughts a little, because they're kind of scattered right now.

Someone close to me recently pronounced that gay marriage was a "right". Me being the flaming liberal that I am, I cheered, but also... I wondered if it was worth pointing out that I disagree.

Am I crazy??? No. Americans have "certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." Some people like to ignore that word "among", creating a very literal translation of what "rights" an American citizen enjoys. Usually, I'm not one of those people. Mostly, because I think a whole bunch of things fall under the definitions of "Life" - stuff like food and clothing and shelter and health care.

But where would you put "marriage" into that trifecta? Under the pursuit of "happiness"? Really? Have you seen our divorce rate?

That's my problem with gay marriage in a nutshell: I think marriage itself is kind of... how to say this gently... Um, a con? Rip-off? How about just plain unnecessary? Yes, unnecessary is the best description I think. It's necessary to nothing, let alone to Life, Liberty, and Happiness. So how can it be a right?

In the strictest terms, it's not. It's an agreement, a contract, a religious rite/observance, a piece of paper, a piece of insurance for your own peace of mind. It's a lot of things, but a right? Not really.

So... why all the fuss?

Because someone decided to make it a right the moment our government said "you guys can do it, but you guys can't." They made it an extra bonus, a privilege, an honor bestowed on a class of people but denied to another class. WHAM! Our government created a second class of citizens that were not allowed to do something that people in the first class could. And not only that, but once those people were married, they were given benefits that could not be achieved in any other way. Now there are two classes where not only does one get to do something the other can't, but then they are rewarded and favored for going through with it.

Someone speaking before the legislature today expounded how this is very much not about civil rights. Hello?! Could this be any more about civil rights? Our government has created a second class of citizens for the sole purpose of denying something to them. That sounds pretty much exactly like a civil rights issue to me.

Marriage is silly. It's frivolous. But in America, there are financial and civil considerations involved. People get married for the "wrong" reasons all the time. There is a small minority who would actually like to get married for the only right one: love. It's time to keep your religion in your churches, your laws out of my love life, and let us all enjoy a little equality for a change. That's what America's supposed to be founded on, right?